🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that could add several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's block that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its decision.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the districts established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissent

Through a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's ruling. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling comes amid a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic officials lamented the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A senior House figure said the court had yet again shredded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.