Professional Network Visibility Boost: Female Professionals Find Better Results By Presenting as Men
Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?
If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.
The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility
Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.
Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.
Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised
The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.
Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.
Company Statement
In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.
Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.
"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.
Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.
The Process
- Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
- Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
- Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language
The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.
The Negative Aspect
Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.
"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."
She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."
Varying Outcomes
Some testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.
"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.
Wider Consequences
These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.
System Details
According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.
The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.
Changing Landscape
As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.
"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."